Solutions
Built for the people who answer for a payment
Every agent-initiated payment has someone who has to explain it when it goes wrong. Here's what each of them gets from Pehtee-Nu.
By role
Who asks, and what they need to show
Payment operations In development
- The question
- A payment an agent sent looks wrong. What happened, and why?
- What you get
- A reconstruction of that payment (instruction, inputs, execution), built from the records you already keep.
Treasury In development
- The question
- Agents are moving company money. Can you show what each of them did, and why?
- What you get
- A payment-by-payment record of agent activity that stands up when someone outside the team asks.
Fraud & risk In development
- The question
- A payment matched its instruction perfectly. Was the instruction itself procured by fraud?
- What you get
- The inputs and reasoning behind an instruction, not only the fact that execution matched it.
Compliance & audit In development
- The question
- An examiner or counterparty asks about one specific payment. Evidence that a policy existed is not an answer.
- What you get
- A record of that payment you can hand to the examiner or counterparty directly.
Does this describe your work?
We're early, and learning from the people who do this work. The most useful thing we can hear is how your team records what its agents were asked to do and what they did, and who you would trust to hold that record.